The mystic desires what Omar Khayyam calls wine; the Wine of Christ,
after drinking which, no one will ever thirst.
Bowl of Saki, by Hazrat Inayat Khan
Commentary by Pir-o-Murshid Inayat Khan:
There are many ideas which intoxicate man, many feelings there are which act upon the soul as wine, but there is no stronger wine than the wine of selflessness. It is a might and it is a pride that no worldly rank can give. To become something is a limitation, whatever one may become. Even if a person were to be called the king of the world, he would still not be emperor of the universe. If he were the master of earth, he would still be the slave of Heaven. It is the person who is no one, who is no one and yet all. The Sufi, therefore, takes the path of being nothing instead of being something. It is this feeling of nothingness which turns the human heart into an empty cup into which the wine of immortality is poured. It is this state of bliss which every truth-seeking soul yearns to attain.
Wine is symbolical of the soul's evolution. Wine comes from the annihilation of grapes, immortality comes from the annihilation of self.
I drink the wine of Thy divine presence and lose myself in its intoxication.
When the soul is illuminated, it will desire to find some other soul illuminated in like manner, and will find great joy and bliss in its society. Such a one will surely find others who are on the verge of illumination. Even a drunkard will find others to drink with. And so it is mystically. A very little light can be turned into a flame, and that flame into a very big flame. Why is it better to become a mystic than to remain a drunkard? As a matter of fact a drunkard will never be satisfied. The mystic will look for what Omar Khayyam calls wine: the wine of the Christ, after drinking which no one will ever thirst. He will always seek the wine whose intoxication never wears off. It is the only wine: the intoxication of the divine love.
There is a wine which the mystic drinks, and that wine is ecstasy. A wine so powerful that the presence of the mystic becomes as wine for everyone who comes into his presence. ... That intoxication is the love which manifests in the human heart. What does it matter, once a mystic has drunk that wine, whether he is sitting amongst the rocks in the wilderness, or in a palace? It is all the same. The palace does not deprive him of the mystic's pleasures, and neither does the rock take them away. He has found the kingdom of God on earth, about which Jesus Christ said, 'Seek ye first the kingdom of God, and all these things shall be added unto you.'
~~~ The mystic desires that which Omar Khayyam calls wine, the wine of Christ, after drinking which, no one will ever thirst.
So sobering is this news that I have moved to the top of this email an encouraging reminder from the originator of this message. Please read the following, forward to your lists and support the "Want To Know" website for the accurate news that is being withheld from us. This is just more reason why major steps need to be taken to change our present regime.
To subscribe to or unsubscribe from this list (one email every few days) or to reply to this message, see end of email
This message is available online at http://www.WantToKnow.info/060507newsjournalistsprevented
"The story was developing a momentum of its own, despite a virtual news blackout from the major media. Ultimately, public pressure forced the national newspapers into the fray. The Washington Post, the NY Times, and the LA Times published stories, but spent little time exploring the CIA’s activities. Instead, my reporting became the focus. It was remarkable [my editor] Ceppos wrote, that the four Post reporters assigned to debunk the series “could not find a single significant factual error.” A few months later, the Mercury News [due to intense CIA pressure] backed away from the story, publishing a long column by Ceppos apologizing for “shortcomings.” The NY Times hailed Ceppos for “setting a brave new standard,” and splashed his apology on their front page." (click for more)
-- Pulitzer Prize winner Gary Webb, excerpted from landmark book Into The Buzzsaw
We all know that the U.S. and other developed countries have a relatively free press. Yet we also know that corporate ownership of the press at times influences what is published. After reading the revealing summary below of Emmy Award winning reporter Kristina Borjesson's book Into the Buzzsaw, you may come to agree with me that the media is much more controlled than most people think. Please join in calling for a truly free press by spreading this information to your friends and colleagues and insisting that the media cover the most crucial stories mentioned here. Thanks for caring, and you have a great day!
Jane Akre—Fox News. After our struggle to air an honest report on hormones in milk, Fox fired the general manager of our station. The new GM said that if we didn’t agree to changes that the lawyers were insisting upon, we’d be fired for insubordination in 48 hours. We pleaded with him to look at the facts we’d uncovered. His reply: “We paid $3 billion dollars for these stations. We’ll tell you what the news is. The news is what we say it is!” After we refused, Fox’s GM presented us an agreement that would give us a full year of salary, and benefits worth close to $200,000, but with strings attached: no mention of how Fox covered up the story and no opportunity to ever expose the facts. After declining, we were fired. (click for more)
Dan Rather—CBS, Multiple Emmy Awards. What's going on is a belief that you can manipulate communicable trust between the leadership and the led. The way you do that is you don't let the press in anywhere. Access to war is extremely limited. The fiercer the combat, the more the access is limited, including access to information. This is a direct contradiction of the stated policy of maximum access to information consistent with national security...There was a time in South Africa when people would put flaming tires around people's necks if they dissented. In some ways the fear now in the U.S. is that you will have a flaming tire of lack of patriotism put around your neck. That fear keeps journalists from asking the tough questions. I am humbled to say, I do not except myself from this criticism. (click for more)
Monika Jensen-Stevenson—Emmy-winning producer for 60 minutes. Robert R. Garwood—14 years a prisoner of the Vietnamese—was found guilty in the longest court-martial in US history. At the end of the court-martial, there seemed no question that Garwood was a monstrous traitor. Several years later in 1985, Garwood was speaking publicly about something that had never made the news during his court-martial. He knew of other American prisoners in Vietnam long after the war was over. He was supported by Vietnam veterans whose war records were impeccable….My sources included outstanding experts like former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency General Tighe and returned POWs like Captain McDaniel, who held the Navy’s top award for bravery. With such advocates, it was hard not to consider the possibility that prisoners (some 3,500) had in fact been kept by the Vietnamese as hostages to make sure the US would pay the more than $3 billion in war reparations. After the war, American POWs had become worthless pawns. The US had not paid the promised monies and had no intention of paying in the future. (click for more)
Kristina Borjesson—CBS, Emmy award winner. Pierre
Salinger announced to the world on Nov. 8, 1996, that he’d
received documents proving that a US Navy missile had
accidentally downed TWA flight 800. That same day, FBI’s Jim
Kallstrom called a press conference. A man raised his hand and
asked why the Navy was involved in the recovery and
investigation while a possible suspect. “Remove him!” Kallstrom
yelled. Two men leapt over to the questioner and grabbed him by
the arms. There was a momentary chill in the air after the guy
had been dragged out of the room. Kallstrom and entourage acted
as if nothing had happened. [Kallstrom was later hired by CBS.]
Greg Palast—BBC. In the months leading up to the November 2000 balloting, Gov. Jeb Bush ordered elections supervisors to purge 58,000 voters on the grounds they were felons not entitled to vote. As it turns out, only a handful of these voters were felons. This extraordinary news ran on page one of the country’s leading paper. Unfortunately, it was the wrong country: Britain. In the USA, it was not covered. The office of the governor also illegally ordered the removal of felons from voter rolls—real felons—but with the right to vote under law. As a result, 50,000 of these voters could not vote. The fact that 90% of these were Democrats should have made it news as this alone more than accounted for Bush’s victory. (click for more)
Michael Levine—25-year veteran of DEA, writer for New York Times, Los Angeles Times, USA Today. The Chang Mai “factory” that the CIA prevented me from destroying was the source of massive amounts of heroin being smuggled into the US in the bodies and body bags of GIs killed in Vietnam. Case after case was killed by CIA and State Department intervention and there wasn’t a thing we could do about it….In 1980, CIA-recruited mercenaries and drug traffickers unseated Bolivia’s democratically elected president. Immediately after the coup, cocaine production increased massively. Bolivia became the source of virtually 100% of the cocaine entering the US. This was the beginning of the crack “plague.”…The CIA along with State and Justice Departments had to protect their drug-dealing assets by destroying a DEA investigation. How do I know? I was the inside source. I sat down at my desk in the American embassy and wrote evidence of my charges. I addressed it to Newsweek. Three weeks later DEA’s internal security called to notify me that I was under investigation….The highlight of the 60 Minutes piece is when the administrator of the DEA, Federal Judge Robert Bonner, tells Mike Wallace, “There is no other way to put it, Mike, what the CIA did is drug smuggling. It’s illegal.” (click for more)
Gary Webb—San Jose Mercury News, Pulitzer Prize winner. In 1996, I wrote a series of stories that began this way: For the better part of a decade, a Bay Area drug ring sold tons of cocaine to the Crips and Bloods gangs of LA and funneled millions in drug profits to a guerilla army run by the CIA. The cocaine that flooded in helped spark a crack explosion in urban America….The story was developing a momentum all of its own, despite a virtual news blackout from the major media. Ultimately, it was public pressure that forced the national newspapers into the fray. The Washington Post, the New York Times, and the Los Angeles Times published stories, but spent little time exploring the CIA’s activities. Instead, my reporting and I became the focus of their scrutiny. It was remarkable [Mercury News editor] Ceppos wrote, that the four Washington Post reporters assigned to debunk the series “could not find a single significant factual error.” A few months later, the Mercury News [due to intense CIA pressure] backed away from the story, publishing a long column by Ceppos apologizing for “shortcomings.” The New York Times hailed Ceppos for “setting a brave new standard,” and splashed his apology on their front page, the first time the series had ever been mentioned there. I quit the Mercury News not long after that….Do we have a free press today? Sure. It’s free to report all the sex scandals, all the stock market news, and every new health fad that comes down the pike. But when it comes to the real down and dirty stuff—such stories are not even open for discussion. (click for more)
John Kelly—Author, ABC producer. ABC hired me to help produce a story about an investment firm that was heavily involved with the CIA. Part of the ABC report charged that the CIA had plotted to assassinate an American, Ron Rewald, the president of the investment firm. Scott Barnes said on camera that the CIA had asked him to kill Rewald. After the show aired, CIA officials met with ABC executive David Burke, who was sufficiently impressed “by the vigor with which they made their case” to order an on-air “clarification.” But that was not enough. CIA Director Casey called ABC Chairman Goldenson. Thus, despite all the documented evidence presented in the program, despite ABC standing by the program in a second broadcast, Peter Jennings reported that ABC could no longer substantiate the charges. That same day, the CIA filed a formal complaint with the FCC charging that ABC had “deliberately distorted” the news. In the complaint, Casey asked that ABC be stripped of its TV and radio licenses….During this time, Capital Cities Communications was maneuvering to buy ABC. CIA Director Casey was one of the founders of Cap Cities. Cap Cities bought ABC. Within months, the entire investigative unit was dispersed. (click for more)
Robert McChesney—500 radio & TV appearances. There has been a striking consolidation of the media from hundreds of firms to an industry dominated by less than ten enormous transnational conglomerates. The largest ten media firms own all US TV networks, most TV stations, all major film studios, all major music companies, nearly all cable TV channels, much of the book and magazine publishing industry, and much, much more. Expensive investigative journalism—especially that which goes after national security or powerful corporate interests—is discouraged. Largely irrelevant human interest/tragedy stories get extensive coverage….A few weeks after the war began in Afghanistan, CNN president Isaacson authorized CNN to provide two different versions of the war: a more critical one for the global audience and a sugarcoated one for Americans….It is nearly impossible to conceive of a better world without some changes in the media status quo. We have no time to waste. (click for more)
Final Note: Remember that with your help, we can and will build a brighter future for us all. And for some deeply inspiring stories to provide balance to all of this: http://www.WantToKnow.info/coverupnews#inspiration
Your donations, however large or small, help greatly to support this
To make a donation by credit card, check, or money order: http://www.WantToKnow.info/donationswtk
Explore these empowering websites coordinated by the nonprofit
http://www.momentoflove.org - Every person in the world has a heart
http://www.WantToKnow.info - Reliable, verifiable information on major cover-ups
http://www.inspiringcommunity.org - Building a Global Community for All
http://www.weboflove.org - Strengthening the Web of Love that interconnects us all
Educational websites promoting transformation through information and inspiration
Because side effect information on any drug is often hard to come by, sketchy and, at times, confusing, knowing about the potential for psychotic side effects before taking a drug is often the exception rather than the rule.
Whether you want to know before taking a drug yourself, giving one to a child, or suspect someone you know may be experiencing psychotic effects, make a note of the drugs below, and their potential for drastic psychotic side effects.
Drug Name(s) Prescribed For Psychotic Effects
Ritalin, Concerta, Methylin and Metadate
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
* Visual hallucinations
* Suicidal ideation
* Psychotic behavior
* Violent behavior
Prozac, Zoloft, Paxil, Celexa and Lexapro
(SSRI (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor)
Depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), panic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder
* Akathisia, an overwhelming physical and mental restlessness, which can lead to destructive behavior
* Suicidal thoughts and behaviors
* Mania and manic-like symptoms
* Violent behavior
Accutane, Amnesteem, Claravis and Sotret
* Suicidal ideation and attempts
* Violent behavior
* Emotional instability
Xanax, Valium, Ativan and Klonopin
Anxiety, insomnia, epilepsy, muscles spasms,
* Increased excitement
* Irritability and aggression
* Hostility and impulsivity
* Attacks of rage or violence
* Antisocial behaviors
* Suicidal ideation
Is it YOUR Right to Know Who's Using Drugs With Psychotic Side Effects?
Certainly most would not argue that the patient has a right to know what types of side effects any medication might cause (though this may or may not happen).
But what about your neighbors? Coworkers? Family? Do they have a right to know that someone close to them may experience psychosis as a drug side effect?
Considering that it could put them in harm's way, some would say yes. Others would say it's nobody's business but the patient's.
As it stands, no one is required to tell anyone anything. Doctors, yes, should tell their patients the risks, but do they?
Debbie Lown, whose husband was affected by Lariam while in the military, voiced her opinion when she complained about the drug to military authorities as long ago as 1996.
Said Lown, "I said, 'I'm not asking you to stop giving them the Lariam. I'm just asking you to better inform the soldiers of what they're taking, tell their wives, because they'll save marriages that way, they'll save lives that way.'"
Compliments of Scio News: Watch out for these
Keth Luke, editor,
The Divine Tune-Up Team: Jan Carter, Dr Light, our Angels, Cosmic, ET, and Earthly Crew